The comments section to the post heralded some very interesting takes on whether it was appropriate to have the imagery of a man who was responsible for starting World War 2 and causing the deaths of over 6 million Jews.
Some of the comments are below;
colman@colmanwainga1· ADOLF HITLER gave independence to AFRICANS by proxy...the 2nd world war he instigated made it very expensive for imperialists to continue running their affairs in Africa..hence they had no otherwise but to wind up and go back and tend to their shattered economies1950256
Arnold Lakita@Arnimal2000 Hmmm...Interesting point
13KJa Koyare@Alex_gyst· Knowing all we know now, the man was a visionary and quite ahead of his time.
Arnold Lakita@Arnimal2000· That's kinda subjective considering he was a genocidal maniac, but like the saying goes, 'one man's hero is another's villain'.
ClickHere__ But we print the queen as a saint. How many Africans were killed by the west? But when the west kills the west they make us hate the "villain". KKK still exists but Hitler's images and the swastika is an arrestable offence. Buana bado tumecolonisiwa
Rono II@RonoAlphas· Why should they be arrested ? (Unless it is for other traffic violations, not the graffiti).550
KArnold Lakita@Arnimal2000· I'd assume it is not coz of 'Offensive Art', even though as an artist I do fully believe in freedom of expression, this is cutting it a bit too close, though in a subversive way it's hilarious, coz do they even know who that dude is???
5 Make Up tips Gen Z's should consider