In cases of malice, it means if the statement made by the person was false and that person knew it was false but still published it without proving the truth of the statement.
So it all lies on whoever is making the complaint to prove that the statements made had the effects mentioned above.
Also, the person being accused has to prove that the matter was of public interest and that whatever was said was a fair comment on the matter.
"A defamatory statement is presumed to be false unless the defendant can prove its truth. Defamation law puts the burden of proving the truth of allegedly defamatory statements on the defendant, rather than the plaintiff."
The following are the defenses one can use against a defamation lawsuit.
- You have to justify that the words said were true and did not cause any injury to the victim.
- There's the matter of absolute privilege whereby which relates to reporting court or parliamentary proceedings.
- There's qualified privilege whereby reporting about conflicting parties or an issue does not make the other party look guilty or get any slander from the receivers of the information.
- You can defend yourself also on the basis of the matter being of public interest and whatever was said was fair comment.
Read also
Jules Gaitho Explores the Seasons of Friendship